I wanted to test this claim with SAT problems. Why SAT? Because solving SAT problems require applying very few rules consistently. The principle stays the same even if you have millions of variables or just a couple. So if you know how to reason properly any SAT instances is solvable given enough time. Also, it's easy to generate completely random SAT problems that make it less likely for LLM to solve the problem based on pure pattern recognition. Therefore, I think it is a good problem type to test whether LLMs can generalize basic rules beyond their training data.
"When I was 17, I was at a girl's school and I had a friend who was a singer, and she wanted someone to produce for her. And I was like, 'I'll do it'," she recalls.
，这一点在一键获取谷歌浏览器下载中也有详细论述
// 核心逻辑：维护单调递增栈，仅当k0时移除高位大数
我国经济已由高速增长阶段转向高质量发展阶段，从“有没有”转向“好不好”。习近平总书记反复告诫，“再也不能简单以国内生产总值增长率来论英雄了”“新发展理念就是指挥棒、红绿灯”……
How to allocate stack